Re: RFC: comparable and hashable traits
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: RFC: comparable and hashable traits
- From: Ori Bernstein <ori@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: myrddin-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 11:03:00 -0700
- To: myrddin-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Cc: Chris Waldon <christopher.waldon.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 02 Nov 2017 10:37:31 -0400 Chris Waldon <christopher.waldon.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Personally, I think `equatable` and `eq` make a lot more sense in this > context. Seems like a simple tweak to make if there aren't objections. > > -Chris Alright, the renaming has been done. Tests are also passing, which leaves regenerating the bootstrap before the work can be merged.
RFC: comparable and hashable traits | Lucas Gabriel Vuotto <lvuotto92@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: RFC: comparable and hashable traits | Ori Bernstein <ori@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: RFC: comparable and hashable traits | Chris Waldon <christopher.waldon.dev@xxxxxxxxx> |
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: comparable and hashable traits
- Next by Date: New maintainer for libtermdraw
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: comparable and hashable traits
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: comparable and hashable traits
- Index(es):