Re: What is the expected section for type descriptors?
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: What is the expected section for type descriptors?
- From: nml <arumakanil@xxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: myrddin-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 12:14:37 +0000
- To: myrddin-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ah, never mind. I misled myself by reading into the output of objdump too much. nml <arumakanil@xxxxxxxxx>於 2017年12月1日 週五,下午7:44寫道: > https://github.com/oridb/mc/blob/master/6/gengas.c#L489 > > The type descriptors follow immediately the .text section as I see in the > output assembly. > So I assume they belong to the same .text section as functions do. > > Are they deliberately packed into the .text section? they look like > non-executable data. > > >
What is the expected section for type descriptors? | nml <arumakanil@xxxxxxxxx> |
- Prev by Date: What is the expected section for type descriptors?
- Next by Date: Re: Smaller binary size
- Previous by thread: What is the expected section for type descriptors?
- Next by thread: Pointer arithmetic and iterations
- Index(es):